Tuesday, November 21, 2017

Roy Halladay Was A Philly Kind Of Player

by Sam Lopresti, OTSL Special Contributor

Halladay immediately burrowed into the hearts of Phillies fans. His loss will sting for a long time.

To baseball at large, Roy Halladay will mostly be remembered as a Toronto Blue Jay. But his untimely death will hit the city of Philadelphia just as hard as Toronto.
He only spent four years of his 16-year career with the Philadelphia Phillies. Only two of those years saw him at the height of his power, but he is firmly entrenched in the lore of this team. He gave us so many incredible memories in that brief time that it’s not a stretch to say he belongs in the pantheon of the ultimate Phillies greats, both because of the memories he provided and because of the way he went about his work.
Halladay arrived in 2010 in a three-team trade that sent prospects to the Blue Jays and another ace pitcher, Cliff Lee, to the Seattle Mariners. That end of the trade puzzled fans, but the main feeling was one of euphoria. The city still wasn’t used to the success that the Phillies had had in the previous three years, and now the best pitcher in baseball was ours! It was the start of something big.
The memories started early. Within a month Halladay had thrown a pair of shutouts—then delivered one of the greatest moments in Phillies history.

Perfection

I remember it well. As a Phillies fan growing up in New York, watching the team was difficult, but MLB Network was making things easier. I was eating in the kitchen when I turned on the channel and saw they were running bonus coverage: with the Phillies leading 1-0, Roy Halladay was pitching in the seventh inning and hadn’t allowed a baserunner. I immediately called my father, who was having dinner at a family friend’s apartment.
“Dad,” I said into the phone, “Do you have access to MLB Network over there? Roy Halladay is pitching a thingy.”
Thingy is the code my father and I, both respectful of baseball superstition, use when we talk about no-hitters in progress. I immediately clarified: "Actually it's a big thingy" - further code for perfect game.
My dad had watched Jim Bunning pitch his perfect game for the Phillies with his grandfather in 1964. There was no way he would miss this. With the blessing of our friend, who was immediately intrigued himself, my dad turned on the game, and we stayed on the phone together as we watched him complete the second perfect game in team history and the 20th in the history of baseball.

True grit

The 2010 season would be incredible even by Halladay's standards. He went 21-10, the first Phillie to win 20 games in a season since Steve Carlton in 1982. He threw nine complete games and four shutouts, winning the NL Cy Young Award with ease before he put an exclamation mark on the season by throwing the second no-hitter in playoff history in his postseason debut against the Cincinnati Reds, another huge moment in the history of the team crammed into a single year. He arguably pitched even better than he had in his perfect game.
Halladay got out-dueled by Tim Lincecum in the first game of the NLCS that year and took the mound in Game 5 with the Phillies facing elimination. As if the legend of his season could not go any deeper, Halladay suffered a groin injury in the second inning but gutted through six innings to win the game and extend the series. In a blue-collar town like Philadelphia, that kind of grit means something.
Then came 2011, the return of Cliff Lee, the R2C2 rotation, 19 more wins, eight more complete games, and two sparkling performances in the NLDS against the St. Louis Cardinals: eight innings in a Game 1 win and eight more in the heartbreaking Game 5 pitcher's duel with Chris Carpenter when the Phillies were eliminated.
No one thought the window would close on the Phillies or Halladay so soon. Injuries sapped Halladay's effectiveness in 2012 and by the end of 2013, after making only 13 starts, he was out of baseball. The Phillies faded in a similar fashion as injury diminished core players like Ryan Howard and Chase Utley. By 2014 they were the worst team in baseball.

Behind the scenes

The memories the man called "Doc" gave Phillies fans will be remembered forever, but we loved him for so much more than that. In a hard-nosed town like Philly, Halladay's work ethic endeared him to fans almost more than what he did when he took the mound. It rubbed off on every player he ever played with, and players like Kyle Kendrick and Vance Worley never saw the success they did after their career paths took them away from Doc's example.
His work ethic couldn't be summed up better than in this Instagram post made by Utley shortly after the announcement of his death:
My heart hurts writing this. I can still remember the first day we met. It was 5:45am on the first day of spring training when I arrived. He was finishing his breakfast but his clothes were soaking wet. I asked if it was raining when he got in. He laughed and said “No I just finished my workout” I knew right then- he was the real deal. Thank you Roy for allowing us to witness what it takes to be the best. We will all miss you.
That work ethic was backed up by an incredible humility. Perhaps born of his experience being demoted all the way back to Class A early in his career, Halladay never thought of his success as his work alone. After his perfect game, he ordered Swiss watches for 60 of his teammates, clubhouse staff, and front office personnel. Each watch was engraved with the line score of the game, the recipient's name, and the words, "We did it together."
He never hesitated to credit his teammates for his achievements. He called Carlos Ruiz "the best catcher I've ever thrown to" last August, and when he won the Cy Young in 2010, he had a replica of the award made and presented it to his catcher. After being named the cover athlete for MLB 2K11, he made a hysterical commercial that saw him taking signs from a pillow with Ruiz's picture on it to make everyday life decisions like which lunch meat to use.
But there is perhaps no better example of his team-first philosophy than how he responded to the formation of the historic 2011 starting rotation. In the run-up to the season, when Halladay, Lee, Hamels, and Roy Oswalt were being presented as the Four Aces, Halladay took exception to the fact that #5 starter Joe Blanton was being overlooked. To Doc, there were not four aces.  There were five.

Why we truly love him

All these things brought Roy Halladay close to the hearts of Phillies fans. But there is one other thing—perhaps the most important. Something that no one outside of Philadelphia will really be able to understand.
Philadelphia has often lived in the shadow of more glamorous sports cities like Los Angeles and, especially, New York, which is just 94 miles away. Combined with the fact that the Phillies are, by record, the losingest franchise in baseball history, big-time players often pass over the Phils for teams like the Yankees or Mets.
That's why the trade that brought Roy Halladay to Philadelphia in the 2009-10 offseason really struck a chord with Philadelphia fans. Roy Halladay had a no-trade clause in his contract with the Blue Jays. He had his pick where he would go if he moved on from the only team he had ever known. It's why the Mariners pursued Lee as part of that three-way deal, because Halladay had turned Seattle down.
It's this last point that is the foundation that holds up all the other reasons that Doc will be revered by Phillies fans for generations to come despite having such a brief peak in Philadelphia. It's the same reason that Jim Thome and Cliff Lee are treated with similar adoration despite their relatively short careers with the Phillies.
Roy Halladay, the best pitcher of his time, at the peak of his powers, could have gone anywhere he wanted.
And he chose us.
Sam Lopresti is a Contributing Writer to RealSport.
They have graciously allowed us to put this on our blog. 
You can find the originally published version of this piece at

Saturday, June 03, 2017

Tribute to ESPN's "The Sports Reporters"


By Pedro Hazel, Jr. & Steve Ferguson - OTSL's Creators


Sunday, May 7th, was the last showing of "The Sports Reporters" on ESPN after nearly 30 years on the air.  

The show was originally hosted by current Orioles broadcaster Gary Thorne, but was graced by two great hosts: Dick Schapp and John Saunders. Schapp passed away in 2001 and Saunders last year. 

"The Sports Reporters" had a very special meaning for Steve and myself along with Jay Kaplan and former host Joel Mahan. "On The Sportslines" was created to be a cross between "The Sports Reporters" and "The Best Damn Sports Show Period", though we are more irreverent than "Reporters" but not as much as "Best Damn".

The very first show we did in 2001 featured Joel and Steve. I wasn't even on it as I was recovering from the flu. I hosted the second show and continued hosting "Sportslines" until the fall of 2006.  On several of the early shows I hosted I would sit second to right with the other hosts just like John Saunders and the panel on ESPN.  

It's unfortunate that a great show that was a Sunday staple for ESPN for nearly three decades has left the air.  We thought it was one of the most intelligent and well thought out shows ever done that aired on ESPN with the exception of "Pardon The Interruption". 

It's a very sad ending to such a great program, but Steve, myself and the rest of us at "On The Sportslines" will continue to keep the spirit of "The Sports Reporters" alive every time we do our show.

Sunday, March 12, 2017

An OTSL Selection Sunday Conversation

By Steve "The Rabbi" Rabinowitz (OTSL Producer) & Jay Kaplan (OTSL Lead Analyst)

STEVE RABINOWITZ: It's the most wonderful day of the year, welcome to Selection Sunday!  In this column, me and my partner, Mr. Jay Kaplan, will look ahead to what WE think the brackets will look like.  How does this day rank on the ladder of sports days for you sir?

JAY KAPLAN: Oh, this is the appetizer to the Main Course for me. This is where all the back-and-forth and Bracketology dissection finally comes to a head. The Rubber meets the Road today. The interesting thing for me this year, is that unlike most years, the Committee will not really have to deal with much in the way of Bid Thievery.

SR: This is one of those years where the Bubble is very small and there's still a tiny discussion we need to have on that but let's start with the cream of the crop: the #1 Seeds.  Jay, Villanova will be a consensus #1 overall, and despite Kansas losing in the Big 12 tourney, they look like a #1 as well.  The other 2 top seeds are in question, which is shocking.  Some people are saying Duke should get a #1 (which I think is ridiculous) over Carolina, and there's always that question about Gonzaga.  What say you, especially to the former since you're an expert in all things Tobacco Road?

JK: Well Duke has impressed over the last 4 days. First team to ever win 4 games to win the ACC tournament en route to the tournament title. I understand where the argument comes from that they should be a #1 seed. However, I don't see that UNC losing to Duke in the ACC tournament as the reason they lose their #1 seed. The question for me regarding Duke as a #1 is not whether that knocks UNC off the Top Line, but does it knock Gonzaga off the Top Line? That being said, I think you also have to take into account whether Arizona is more deserving as a #1 seed based on how things played out last night in the PAC-12 Tournament Championship game.

SR: I think overall, if the Zags get knocked down to a #2 in the WEST, they'll take it and say thank you.  Gonzaga actually beat Arizona early in the season on a neutral court so, to take into account that you have a one loss team, who won the regular season and post-season conference titles and you're telling me they are worse than the team that only won in the postseason tourney, and the fact that Arizon has 3 more losses?  Doesn't fly for me.  As for Duke?  The body of work in the regular season PLUS the fact that they looked inferior to Carolina until Berry went out on Friday, makes me think they're a #2.  Love the ACC to death, but I'm not putting someone who was the FIFTH best team in their conference in the regular season on the Top Line.  By the way, the true nightmare for Gonzaga would be if UNC was the #2 in THEIR region.  It'd be the ultimate Screw You from the NCAA.

JK: I have the utmost respect for what Mark Few and the Zags have done, but I would not be surprised if Gonzaga gets knocked down to the #2 line and Arizona moves up to the #1 line.  Top tier teams of the PAC-12 are up there with the top tier teams in any of the Power 5 conferences.  I have a feeling that even if Gonzaga holds on to their spot on the #1 line, whomever the #2 in their region turns out to be will be a team that is likely deserving of a #1.  I agree with your premise that Duke's overall resume is not #1 seed-worthy and I agree that Berry being forced to sit that very long stretch with foul trouble was what turned the tide in Duke's favor.  Granted, Justin Jackson being MIA didn't help, but as I said to you during the game, Berry is the engine that drives the Carolina offense.

SR: Yeah, I kind of wouldn't be surprised if Gonzaga dropped to the #2 line (especially since they were the last overall #1 four weeks ago on the mock bracket the committee revealed), but I think if it comes to Arizona over Gonzaga, I do have a problem and would almost be a bad precedent set by the committee.  Bubble talk is always the other major talk around this time of year; and it's a very small bubble.  Joe Lunardi (and others) have a group of 6 that are in that scary territory: Wake Forest, Syracuse, Rhode Island, USC, Illinois State, and Kansas State.  Which 2 of these teams shouldn't get to go dancing (and remember, Rhode Island is playing today so they might be off this line anyway).

JK: Well, I think that Rhode Island can get in even if they don't win today, but they'd prefer a "Win-And-They're-In" lock.  I have to agree with ESPN's Jeff Borzello that Illinois State is a long shot. They do have a Top-30 RPI and 12 wins away from home, plus a 14-point win over Wichita State in their first meeting.  On the flip side, they went 2-4 against the RPI Top 100, have 2 losses to teams outside the Top 100 and Wichita State blew them out in their next two meetings, including that 71-51 win in the MVC title game.  Lunardi cannot get Syracuse right by his own admission.  I cannot seem to either.  Though if it comes down to them or USC, I'd lean slightly towards the Cuse due to the ACC being the best conference in the country.  The tough part is that they are also being measured against a member of their own conference - Wake Forest - who would seem to have a better case for getting off the bubble and into The Dance if you compared both ACC teams against each other.

SR: Yeah, so watching Seth Greenberg this week, makes me think Syracuse won't get in over USC.  Syracuse's non conference losses are remarkably unimpressive: UCONN, Georgetown, St. John's.  Horrible for a Big East team rather than one from the ACC.  Also, they have NO road victories in conference against anyone outside of the bottom 4 of the conference.  Ridiculous.  Coach Jim Boeheim wasn't there to start the season last year, but he's there now.  No excuses, Syracuse is out.  Illinois State also is out, only because of the fact that there's no reason other than that 27-6 record to put them in.  As much as USC is unimpressive, the way that the top of the PAC-12 is allows me to put a 4th team in.  Everything else seems to fall into place for me:  Rhode Island is playing well late; and has a neutral court win over Cincy; and Kansas State has really played well against the top of the Big 12.

JK: USC does have a solid resume - I just took another look at it and it's better than I remembered - so if you're asking me who they knock out of those 6 teams you mentioned, I'd have to change my mind now and go with Syracuse losing out. USC's resume, like Wake's, is more worthy of getting off the Bubble than Syracuse's upon further review.

SR: OK, so, while we look at the Bubble and the Top, the middle gets tremendously overlooked. So, looking at the brackets, give me one team that you feel will be over-seeded when the brackets come out in a few hours and one that will be under-seeded.

JK: You always save the EASY question for last!  I'm not as high on Baylor as some other folks are.  I think that when the brackets come out they'll be off the #2 line, but even as a #3, I think that may be an over-seed.  As for under-seeded?  I'll be interested to see where Purdue winds up.  Lunardi currently has them as a #4, but the question I have is whether the committee holds their loss to Michigan in the Big 10 tournament against them.  Do they stay as a #4 or do they fall to the #5 line?

SR: Michigan is one of the hottest teams in the country, so if Purude falls, I think it'll be more because of the Big 10 as a whole, not that loss.  Best game I saw this week.  As for over-seeded, I can't help but not understand what the obsession over Florida State is.  They have two wins against the RPI top 50 away from home: one against Miami (borderline top 50) and one against Virginia, which happened in December.  As a Top 4 (they currently are a #4), FSU will get the luxury of spending the first weekend in Orlando and I don't think they deserve that.  Under-seeded?  How about some love for the American conference!  I'll go with the double answer of Cincy/SMU.  Neither are a Top 4 seed, which is shameful.  SMU has one of the longest winning streaks in the country and have beaten everyone in front of them, including Cincy on the road.  Meanwhile Cincy, along with their 2-loss American conference record, has wins over Xavier and Big 12 Champion Iowa State.  Whoever wins deserves a #4 seed, loser deserves a #5 and can have a good case for getting a #4 as well.  Remember, UCONN won the title as a #7 seed 3 years ago, and the reason they were seeded that low was their standing in the American conference.

JK: I am VERY familiar with your feeling that the AAC doesn't get the appropriate amount of respect from the committee.  Cincinnati as a #5 and SMU as a #6 by Lunardi does seem to be at least one line lower than maybe they should be, but again, I think this is due to how the AAC is viewed.  As for FSU, they are getting the benefit of the ACC and the fact that they are the best conference in the country.  Going 12-6 in the ACC is impressive and they have an overall RPI of 12. Their Strength Of Schedule (SOS) and Opponent's SOS are both in the Top 25.  I understand why they'll get a #4 seed and I'm not as adamant in my opposition to it as you are.

SR: See, it's just that outside of Tallahassee, FSU hasn't had that "show me" moment this season.  I would say the same thing about Notre Dame, BUT the way they played on a neutral court against "Big Bad Duke" last night proved me otherwise.  They'll be properly placed as a #4 or #5 seed.

JK: I understand where you're coming from on FSU.  They don't look like a marquee team, but it's tough to be one in the ACC outside of Tobacco Road.  I do agree with you about Notre Dame.  Not a fan, but much respect and yes, a spot on the #4 or #5 line will be deserved.  Before we sign off, I'm interested to get your take on a potential double-digit seed that could make some noise.

SR: I'm going to cheat again and give you two answers: Middle Tennessee State is going to be a #11 or #12, and after what they did as a #15 against Michigan State a year ago, I say watch out.  Add to that a win vs. Vanderbilt this year, and I'd say they'll be a very popular upset in Round 1, and I think a lot of people might move them to the Sweet 16.  The other one?  Take a flier on Vermont.  They are going to be the only team in this field that will not have lost this calendar year.  This is the most talented team since the one that beat Syracuse back in the first half of the LAST decade.

JK: Vermont was the team I was looking at.  They're likely to be a #12 seed and they've pulled the #12 vs. #5 upset in the past.  MTSU is interesting, I'll be keeping an eye on them.


SR: All of these are things we'll be keeping an eye on when the bracket comes out in just a few hours.  Please also keep a look out for our OTSL March Madness Special airing LIVE on MNN3 this Thursday, 3/16/17 at 9pm, and up online this weekend on our YouTube channel http://www.youtube.com/onthesportslines.  For Jay Kaplan, I am The Rabbi, Enjoy the upcoming Madness!

Saturday, February 18, 2017

Phil Jackson: From Savior to False Prophet

By Anthony Strait, OTSL Analyst

Flash back to March 18, 2014; Phil Jackson received a thunderous standing ovation as earlier in the day he came home. The man with eleven NBA championships as a coach had officially returned to the franchise where he won two as a player. Phil was a member of those beloved New York Knicks teams that won championships in 1970 and 1973 when the Knicks were the ultimate definition of that word: TEAM. On this day Jackson was now christened as the latest supposed savior to a team that had struggled to maintain any success since 2000. Knicks owner James Dolan had fired GM Glen Grunwald before the 2013-14 season started, mere months after the team Grunwald put together won 54 games, a division title and then their first playoff series win in over a decade. Now Dolan was again bringing in a big name to save a franchise that has made self-sabotaging more common in Midtown than rush hour traffic. Only this time it was the man who once helped the Knicks win titles as a player and also prevented them from winning more while coaching a man named Michael Jordan.

Now flash forward to the present.  Days before the trading deadline in the middle of yet another lost season for the Knicks. The love and optimism that was felt at Madison Square Garden back on that March night has disappeared. The aura now felt is one of confusion, chaos and turmoil. A star player in the midst of constant trade talks and a owner now embroiled in a ugly PR nightmare with a beloved former player. Lost in all this is the job Jackson has done since March 18, 2014.  Three years in and the numbers speak for themselves: 72 wins to 149 losses along with three different head coaches and 45 different players. The man known as “The Zen Master” has created more madness by his actions as well as his ill-timed words. The Knicks need to save face and admit to themselves that yet another big name is just that: a big name. Phil is no savior and now they need to move on in an act of salvation if winning basketball is to return to Madison Square Garden.

From the moment the 2013-2014 Knicks season ended and Phil went over his options he made one questionable decision and only compounded it with more questionable decisions. Jackson fired Mike Woodson instead of allowing him to coach the last year of his contract as Jackson himself made the transition from coach to front office. One would think an individual in Phil’s shoes would keep things intact just to make transitioning easier. When he missed out on Steve Kerr he settled on the just retired Derek Fisher. Jackson’s biggest mistake was not hiring an inexperienced coach to lead a veteran team but rather insisting that the coach run the Triangle offense that Jackson and Tex Winter made legendary. Flawed logic considering today’s NBA which now incorporates small lineups and three-point shooting more than ever.  The Knicks struggled learning the Triangle and eventually Phil decided to press the reset button and blow up the roster. Gone were JR Smith and Iman Shumpert – who would later help the Cavaliers win a championship. The Knicks finished with the worst record in franchise history – 17-65 – in Jackson’s first full season as team president.

He got lucky when Kristaps Portzingis fell into his lap in the 2015 draft but it’s really the only positive on a resume full of negatives. The Knicks improved by 13 games in 2016, but a solid start was derailed by a lengthy losing streak and injuries ruined any hopes of a playoff spot. Phil fired Fisher after a 23-31 start and again pressed the reset button after the season. The building blocks he installed gave way to veterans like Joakim Noah and Derrick Rose in a shift from rebuilding to Win Now mode. It seemed to work at first in December. The Knicks were 14-10 and sitting third in the East when Jackson managed to put his foot in his mouth with controversial remarks involving LeBron James. Jackson referring to James’ business associates as his “posse” was both dumb and insensitive. In typical Jackson fashion, he offered no apology. The comments bashing Carmelo Anthony for not passing in spite of numbers showing differently only began what would now be weeks of a public tug of war against his own star player.

Nowadays Phil Jackson is symbolic for everything that has plagued the Knicks for so many years: lack of continuity, lack of patience, lack of an actual plan and poorly timed bad PR. He passed on interviewing guys like Tom Thibodeau and Frank Vogel while rumors swirled he would give the head coaching job to interim coach Kurt Rambis full time with the Triangle again in mind. He settled on Jeff Hornacek but it still feels like Phil is trying to coach from afar. In his mind the lack of Triangle offense is why the Knicks are struggling; not the realization that his team is among the worst defensive teams in the league. He wants to rebuild around Porzingis but now have Noah’s $72 million contract eating up payroll for the next few years. The guys he traded like Tyson Chandler and Raymond Felton are still producing for other teams. Meanwhile many of the guys he got back in return are no longer with the team. His failure to build a contending team has now resulted in him throwing Melo – a man he convinced to stay and trust the process – under the bus. Three years later and constant changes from a man brought in to bring stability has resulted in a record more than 80 games under .500. Phil “The Savior” is now Phil “The False Prophet”.

In a season that has derailed both on and off the court, whether it’s the trade rumors swirling around the best player or the owner’s poor treatment of team alum, Phil Jackson is in the middle of it all. The Knicks have failed yet again to learn from their past by delving into their past for a big name. Phil with his rings and resume was supposed to bring instant credibility. Last summer those rings were not even good enough for Kevin Durant to sit and have coffee with Phil so you can only imagine how little those rings look now as the team’s bad reputation sweeps through the league. Jackson’s epic failure as President leaves the Knicks more in shambles than before he came home. New York was 127-103 with three playoff appearances and a division title. The team with Phil managed a 17-win season and a game of musical chairs to see all the different players who have worn a Knicks uniform. It’s time both part ways for no other reason than salvation. For Phil it’s his legacy and for the Knicks it’s to bring in someone who can do the job and revive the franchise without the fanfare.

It wasn’t supposed to be this way but when you think back to that night in 2014 Knicks fans in the building at the corner of 33rd and 7th and all around NYC wanted to believe. Unfortunately the man hired to save the Knicks instead has turned into an out of touch Old Man. Knicks fans deserve better; Carmelo Anthony deserves better; even James Dolan who kept his word about staying out of Jackson’s way deserves better. The franchise does need to rebuild, but the simplest solution is really to move on from the Era of Zen. Where one becomes a false prophet not because they fail but rather because they don’t realize that they have failed.

Phil will never admit it to himself so it’s up to the Knicks to do it for him.